An Interview with Bob Matthews

Bob Matthews

Bob Matthews

Today we had the pleasure of interviewing Bob Matthews, a local candidate for County Commissioner, who recently filled out our candidate questionnaire. Bob is a former Miami Township Trustee who believes in the four Fs: Faith, Family, Finance, Future. In our interview, Bob discussed his life, qualifications, and some issues pertinent to Reconstructing Dayton’s mission. Although we won’t be endorsing Bob because his views on regionalism do not align with the mission statement of Reconstructing Dayton, that does not mean we will be endorsing his opponent, Debbie Lieberman. Debbie has still not responded to our survey and her record on regionalism is questionable, as she publicly opposed Dan Foley’s attempt to form a county charter in 2016.

If you’re an undecided voter we highly recommend you check out Bob’s interview. He details several of his policy positions and his overall political philosophy. He discusses his experience in the private sector at various local businesses, his community engagement with local churches, and his government experience as a Miami Township trustee. Although Bob believes in regional cooperation, he thinks this should be accomplished through partnerships formed by sovereign municipalities. Bob also has some novel ideas, such as forming a county “endowment” that would help fund the county for generations to come. We did find his interest in issues such as a consolidated municipal court and consolidating the Treasurer, Auditor, and Recorder to be promising. If Matthews wins we hope to work with him on these issues.

Bob’s positions seem to be rooted in principles and he’s a genuinely likable guy. However, we do not agree that a local emphasis is the best when the locality is determined by arbitrary lines on a map. We believe in a local emphasis, but that local districts should be organized according to an economic zone. For example, Dayton and its surrounding suburbs all represent a single metropolis. Bob said that having multiple municipalities, such as the land locked Oakwood and Riverside, allow for citizens to have greater choice. In an ideal world he may be right, but we do not live in an ideal world. Unfortunately, most people have limited choices. We believe this fragmentation provides the benefit of choice to some at the expense of others. Then, when the inner cities decays and the region becomes less appealing to businesses and families, the entire region suffers as the services provided by the inner city are further distanced from the majority of the county’s citizens and businesses.

Despite our disagreements with some of Bob’s views, we are not arguing that you should vote against him. In this race between Matthews and Lieberman, it appears that regionalism is not a priority to either. Therefore, you should consider other factors when casting your vote. We do not endorse or condemn candidates for their stances on issues unrelated to our mission statement and specific organizational goals, so unless Lieberman comes out and publicly throws her weight behind regionalism or some other issue that is important to us, we will be staying out of this race. If you are an undecided voter, Bob’s interview will provide insight into his ideas, character, and goals. We are grateful that Bob took the time to speak with us and are glad that he felt it was important to directly engage with Montgomery County constituents. We wish we could say the same about Lieberman.

We will be interviewing more candidates in the near future. If you are running for public office in Montgomery County, e-mail us to set up an interview. We’re conducting these interviews to inform Montgomery County residents so nobody has to vote just according to the (D) or (R) next to someone’s name. The local media will not give these candidates this type of in-depth coverage, so more often than not voters don’t know much about the people they’re expected to elect. We want to change that. If you would like to help, please consider donating to make more interviews like this possible in the future.

0 Comments

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Endorsements that don’t matter in Montgomery County | Esrati - […] bail. That said, Arlene Setzer and Bob Matthews aren’t particularly great options either. We interviewed Matthews for Reconstructing Dayton–…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Other posts you might like

An Interview with David Brannon

We sat down and interviewed David Brannon, candidate for Montgomery County Probate court judge. David talked about some key initiatives he plans to implement as probate judge, which is refreshing to hear from a judicial candidate. He also discussed some issues that are important to Reconstructing Dayton, such as consolidating the municipal courts in Montgomery County and the odd partisan structure of judicial races. We’re not endorsing any judicial candidates, but we do think you should give this article a read before committing to either Arvin Miller or David Brannon.

Taxation Without Representation in Montgomery County

Your income tax goes to the local government where you work instead of where you live. This means you are being taxed without being represented. Our state coronavirus relief bill has a provision to keep this structure in place even if you work from home. Now that a repeal of this provision has been proposed, cities are fighting back. We support the repeal and going a step further: all income taxes should go to a government where you have a vote. This country was founded on the concept that individuals should not be taxed without representation. Ohioans shouldn’t put up with it.

Get the latest news to your inbox.

Subscribe